14.13
The FHDRA will be conducted in the most
appropriate way in the interests of the child. In
particular the court shall consider the following matters
Safeguarding, in this
respect
(a) The court shall inform the parties of
the content of the safeguarding letter/report provided by
Cafcass/CAFCASS Cymru, where it has not already been sent
by Cafcass/CAFCASS Cymru to the parties, unless it
considers that to do so would create a risk of harm to a
party or the child. The court may need to consider
whether, and if so how, any information contained in the
checks should be disclosed to the parties if
Cafcass/CAFCASS Cymru have not disclosed the
letter/report.
The court will specifically consider, in
the light of all the information before the court,
including the contents of the safeguarding letter /
report provided by Cafcass / CAFCASS Cymru and any
Supplemental Information Form(s) C1A filed by the
parties.
(b) The nature and extent of any factual
issues and whether a fact-finding hearing is needed to
determine allegations which are not accepted, and whose
resolution is likely to affect the decision of the court.
(c) Risk identification followed by active
case management including risk assessment, and compliance
with the Practice Direction 12J.
(Specific provisions about directions for
a fact-finding hearing are set out in Practice Direction
12J, paragraphs 16 to 20.)
Further
(d) If the safeguarding information is
(contrary to the arrangements set out in the CAP) not
available at the FHDRA, the court should adjourn the
application until the safeguarding checks are available.
Interim orders (unless to protect the safety of a child)
should not be made in the absence of safeguarding checks.
And further
(e) Where the court so directs, a
safeguarding letter/report ought to be attached to any
referral to a supported or supervised child contact
centre in the event the court directs supported or
supervised contact.
MIAM, specifically:
(a) Whether, if a MIAM exemption has been
claimed, the Applicant has validly claimed the exemption;
(b) Whether the Respondent has attended a
MIAM;
(c) If the court finds that a MIAM
exemption has not been validly claimed the court will
direct the applicant or direct the parties to attend a
MIAM and if necessary adjourn the proceedings to enable a
MIAM to take place, unless the court considers that in
all the circumstances of the case, the MIAM requirement
should not apply to the application in question; when
making the decision the court will have particular regard
to the matters contained in rule 3.10(3) FPR.
Mediation, At-Court Mediation
assessment, and other Dispute Resolution:
allowing the parties the time and opportunity to engage
in non-court dispute resolution.
(a) At the FHDRA, the judge will
specifically consider whether, and the extent to which,
the parties can safely resolve some or all of the issues
with the assistance of the Cafcass Officer, WFPO, or a
mediator.
(b) There will be, at every FHDRA, a
period in which the Cafcass Officer, or WFPO, will seek
to conciliate and explore with the parties the resolution
of all or some of the issues between them if safe to do
so. The procedure to be followed in this connection at
the hearing will be determined by local arrangements
between the Cafcass manager, or equivalent in Wales, and
the Designated Family Judge or a justices legal
adviser where appropriate.
The court will further consider
(c) What is the result of any such meeting
at Court?
(d) What other options there are for
resolution e.g. may the case be suitable for further
intervention by Cafcass/CAFCASS Cymru; Should a referral
for mediation be made? Is collaborative law appropriate?
Should the parties be advised to complete a Parenting
Plan?
(e) Would the parties be assisted by
attendance at an Activity Separated Parents Information
Programme, (or in Wales, Working Together For Children
(WT4C)) or other Activity or intervention, whether by
formal statutory provision under section 11 Children Act
1989 or otherwise;
(f) An at-court assessment of the
suitability of the parties for mediation.
Consent Orders
(a) Where agreement is reached at any
hearing or submitted in writing to the court, no order
will be made without scrutiny by the court.
(b) Where safeguarding checks or risk
assessment work remain outstanding, the making of a final
order may be deferred for such work. In such
circumstances the court shall adjourn the case for no
longer than 28 days to a fixed date. A written
notification of this work is to be provided by
Cafcass/CAFCASS Cymru in the form of an updating
Safeguarding letter/report, or if deemed relevant by
Cafcass/CAFCASS Cymru, a section 16A risk assessment in
accordance with the timescale specified by the court. If
satisfactory information is then available, the order may
be made at the adjourned hearing in the agreed terms
without the need for attendance by the parties. If
satisfactory information is not available, the order will
not be made, and the case will be adjourned for further
consideration with an opportunity for the parties to make
further representations
|