General Disclaimer: Nothing presented constitutes legal advice and the McKenzie Friend UK Network is not a legal entity or in anyway claims to be a 'legal resource'. The resource guide is supported by McKenzie Friends and Litigants in person for Litigants in Person in Family Court. McKenzie Friends provide layperson support as an informed friend under the Family Court Practrice Guidance of 2010. All information is published under the spirit of that guidance. For any corrections of the information, please contact the McKenzie Friend UK Network
 
BREACH OF COURT ORDERS: Child Arangements
 
 
 
 
A Child Arrangements Order (CAO) is a legal order issued by the family court that outlines the arrangements for the care and living arrangements of a child. A CAO can specify various aspects of a child's life, including where they will live, who they will spend time with, and how often they will have contact with specific individuals, such as parents or grandparents.
 
A breach of a Child Arrangements Order occurs when one of the parties involved (usually a parent or guardian) does not comply with the terms and conditions set out in the court order. Common examples of breaches include:
 
Non-compliance with visitation rights: If a parent who has been granted contact or visitation rights with the child fails to show up for their scheduled visits or does not return the child on time, it can be considered a breach.
 
  • Refusal to allow contact: If a parent with primary custody or residence refuses to allow the other parent their specified visitation or contact with the child, it can also constitute a breach.
  • Changing the child's residence without consent: If a parent relocates the child to a different location or residence without the agreement of the other parent or without seeking the court's permission, it can be considered a breach.
  • Failure to follow specific conditions: If the CAO includes specific conditions or requirements, such as supervision during contact, and a party fails to adhere to these conditions, it can lead to a breach.
 
When a breach of a Child Arrangements Order occurs, the affected party can take action to address the issue. This may involve seeking enforcement of the existing order, requesting a variation of the order, or taking the matter back to court for a judge to review the situation and potentially make changes to the order to ensure its compliance.
 
It's important to note that family courts in the UK prioritize the best interests of the child, and their primary concern is to ensure that children have a stable and loving environment. Breaches of CAOs can have serious consequences, including legal penalties, so it's essential for all parties involved to adhere to the court-ordered arrangements and, if necessary, seek advice or mediation to address any disputes or issues that may arise.
 
 
The General Principles
 
 
Reasonable Excuses

You will need to consider whether there are reasonable grounds for contact not taking place on that occassion, for example, if your child is unwell, which can be verified by the GP, the car has broken down, that can be verified by a garage, that traffic accident caused the road to be blocked for a long period, a train strike with no other reasonable means of personal or public transport avaiable.

 
Burden of Proof
 
There are two burdens of proof:
 
1. The court has to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that an individual has failed to comply with a provision within the order. This is the higher criminal standard of proof.

2. The burden of proof is on the individual failing to comply with the Child Arrangements Order to show that they had a reasonable excuse for breaking the order. The burden of proof is the balance of probabilities.

 
Enforcement of Order

All contact orders made from December 2008 by a family court include a warning notice which sets out the consequences which could be imposed if the order is breached. If a court order does not contain a warning notice then a party will be unable to apply for an enforcement order where the order is breached.

The court can enforce the order with a fine, community service, compensation or a prison sentence. The existing order can also be varied by the court.

The application to enforce a Child Arrangements Order is made using the Form C79

 
Enforcement of Orders Abroad

UK family court order may still be enforced abroad where the following applies:

  • Countries which are parties to the European Enforcement Order Regulations (EEO);
  • Countries which are signatories to the Brussels Regulation or the Lugano Convention;
  • Countries with which the UK has a reciprocal agreement in place; and
  • Countries for which none of the above apply which are commonly the USA, Japan and China.
 
Duration of Child Arrangement Orders:  
   
The contact arrangements set out in a Child Arrangements Order remain legally binding until the child reaches the age of 16 unless the order specifically states otherwise. This is in accordance with section 91(10) of the Children Act 1989. After this point it will be up to the child to decide how much contact they would like to have with the parent they do not live with.

The ‘live with’ element of a Child Arrangements Order remains legally binding until the child reaches the age of 18, however the Court are very reluctant to enforce such orders beyond the age of 16 unless there are exceptional circumstances.

 
   
Resources  
   
Enforcement of Child Arrangeemnt Orders: Practice Directions  
   
 
   
CASE LAW
 
  1. Re C (A Child) (Contact: Imposition of Conditions) [2014]: This case highlighted the court's authority to impose specific conditions when making CAOs, especially in cases where there are concerns about the child's welfare or safety during contact with a parent.
  2. Re B (A Child) (Suspension of Contact) [2019]: In this case, the court considered whether contact should be suspended temporarily due to allegations of harm or neglect. It emphasized the importance of assessing the child's best interests in making such decisions.
  3. Re W (Enforcement of Child Arrangements Orders) [2019]: This case involved the enforcement of a CAO where one parent repeatedly breached the order. The court examined various enforcement options, including the imposition of fines, community service, and imprisonment.
  4. Re A (A Child) (Temporary Removal from Jurisdiction: Article 20 BIIR) [2013]: This case dealt with the temporary removal of a child from the jurisdiction for holidays or family visits when there were concerns about a potential breach of a CAO.
 
Resources
 
The Case Law National Archive
 
Family Court News
 
Mother accused of parental alienation wins appeal over psychological assessment
Added to the Resource Library: Case Law Lying in the Family Court
Added to Resource Library: Economic Abuse in Financial Settlements
Added to Resource Library: Case Law on Joint 'Lives With' Order
Can a Fact-Finding Ever be reopenned?
Parental Responsibility and the falsehood of paternity.
Keep AI Away from the Family Courts
Children Left in Limbo Waiting for Family Court Decisions
Delays in the Family Court
Pre-nups Will they hold up?
 
SEE ALL NEWS ARTICLES
 
 
Other Great Resources
 
 
 
     
 
 
     
DIRECTOR
 
 
Philip Kedge is a retired police Chief Inspector and the founder and director of the McKenzie Friend UK Network. His aim is to take family court matters out of the hands of lawyers with an ethical business to reduce conflict and acrimony, to provide access to cost effective McKenzie Friend national services, to offer training and to reduce the emotional harm to children.
 
Phil is the founder of the National
Campaign #lightnothate
 
LATEST VIDEO
 
 
     
   
     
  www.mckenziefriendservice.co.uk